BMW and Daimler, the world's top luxury
carmakers, have announced alliances with suppliers, talking up the
virtues of having a bigger pool of engineers to develop a self-driving
car.
Google self-driving prototype car. Reuters
But another motive behind these deals, executives and industry experts told Reuters, is a concern that robocars may not live up to the profit expectations that drove an initial investment rush.
Carmakers are increasingly looking to
forego outright ownership of future autonomous driving systems in favor
of spreading the investment burden and risk.
The trend represents a clear shift in
strategy from little more than a year ago when most automakers were
pursuing standalone strategies focused on tackling the engineering
challenge of developing a self-driving car, rather than on the business
case.
"Although it is a substantial market, it
may not be worth the scale of investments currently being sunk into it,"
said a board member at one of the German carmakers, who declined to be
identified because the matter is confidential.
Dozens of companies - including carmakers
and tech firms like Google and Uber - are vying for a market which,
according to consulting firm Frost & Sullivan, will only make up
about 10 to 15 percent of vehicles in Europe by 2030. There are sure to
be losers.
"It's impossible for me to believe there
will be 50 successful autonomous vehicle software producers," said John
Hoffecker, global vice chairman of Michigan-based consulting firm
AlixPartners.
In July last year, BMW became the first
major carmaker to abandon its solo development of self-driving cars in
favor of teaming up with chipmaker Intel and camera and software
manufacturer Mobileye to build a platform for autonomous cars technology
by 2021.
The decision followed a trip by senior executives to visit startups and suppliers to gauge BMW's competitive position.
"Sitting at other companies, one rattles
off the technological challenges and safety aspects, and you come to
realize that many of us are swimming in the same sludge," Klaus
Buettner, BMW's vice president autonomous driving projects, told Reuters.
"Everybody is investing billions. Our view was that it makes sense to club together to develop some core systems as a platform."
Daimler's Mercedes-Benz has since combined
efforts with supplier Bosch, three months ago, while Japanese carmaker
Honda has said it is open to alliances in the area of autonomous cars.
Even deep-pocketed tech companies are
teaming up. San Francisco-based transport app operator Lyft and Alphabet
Inc's self-driving car unit Waymo pooled their resources in May.
Share The Burden
Partial autonomy is already a reality in
higher-end cars that keep in lane and adjust their speed in motorway
driving. Each of the next stages - "eyes off", "mind off" and ultimately
driverless autonomy - will likely take years to become reality.
Klaus Froehlich, BMW's board member
responsible for development, said the company was likely to lose money
with its first fully autonomous vehicles, just like it did with its
first-generation electric cars. But developing the technology remains a
necessity in order to stay relevant as a carmaker.
"It is an enabling technology, not a
business case," he said about BMW's decision to develop autonomous
vehicles. "But if the burden can be shared on a platform, I have nothing
against that."
One of the most financially promising
markets that autonomous technology will open up is driverless on-demand
taxis, which may one day come to replace regular cabs and parts of
public transport in large cities.
"Robotaxis" are expected to drive the
wider market for car sharing and ride-hailing, which was worth $53
billion last year and could be worth $2 trillion by 2030, according to a
McKinsey study published earlier this year.
Ford and General Motors are investing at
least $2 billion each to develop self-driving vehicles for urban
ride-sharing fleets beginning in 2021, competing with incumbents and
start-ups.
The emergence of alliances involving the
likes of BMW and Mercedes-Benz comes at a time when regulators are
pushing for a creation of standards for the new technology, which has
the potential to improve vehicle reflexes and cut accidents by up to 90
percent, according to Boston Consulting Group.
Industry experts say such standardization
could make it much harder to develop a product which stands out, calling
into question the wisdom of high-stakes, go-it-alone strategies.
Alliances, Mergers
In September 2016, the U.S. Department of
Transport and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration
released guidance for heavily automated vehicles.
The regulator urged carmakers to disclose
how vehicle reflexes are programed, particularly when cars are faced
with a dilemma, such as choosing between hitting a cyclist or
accelerating beyond legal speeds to avoid an accident.
"It is important to consider whether
highly automated vehicles are required to apply particular decision
rules in instances of conflicts between safety, mobility, and legality
objectives," the guidance said.
"Algorithms
for resolving these conflict situations should be developed
transparently using input from federal and state regulators, drivers and
passengers."
European regulators too are debating
whether to standardize speeds and distances which autonomous cars need
to adhere to while weaving in and out of traffic or joining lanes.
Pressure not to waste development costs is
laying the groundwork for alliances and even mergers between the
various companies supplying technology for autonomous cars, including
makers of vehicles, software, computer chips, radar, camera and laser
sensors and high-definition maps.
BMW, Mercedes and Audi put aside their
rivalry and teamed up to buy mapping firm HERE, for example, in order to
cut their dependence on Google.
What starts out as arms-length agreements
designed to capture market share, much like code-sharing deals between
airlines, may evolve further into takeovers once the next investment
round is due, executives and advisers said.
"Will we see what is happening in
aviation be adopted in automotive - where first we see alliances,
collaborations and consortiums, and then we see full out market
combinations?" asked Bill Curtin, head of mergers and acquisitions at
global law firm Hogan Lovells.

No comments:
Post a Comment